On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: >> >>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the >>> monthly SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs. >> >> >> >> ah I was under the impression that motions were debated and voted in the >> meetings, with recourse to e-mail when meeting time ran out after debate >> but before a vote. >> >> Nobody's in thrall to a higher power here, and if the SFC requires every >> single expenditure to be voted, there is a reason, and perhaps the reason >> isn't valid. With resources limited as they are, we need to be vigilant >> about bureaucracy, that's all. >> >> Speaking of which, the SLOBs may wish to consider a motion numbering >> system such as is used by legislatures. It could simplify referencing >> previous decisions, in particular providing a search engine handle which >> could be used to reconcile authorized expenditures. And motions could be >> more easily listed for governance history. >> > > Nice idea. I could start by numbering the motions listed in [1]. > > Done. > -walter > >> >> >> Sean >> >> > [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > <http://www.sugarlabs.org> > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel