Tony, Is there a feature page associated with all of these changes. I am having trouble following it all.
FWIW, I am very much in favor of encouraging reflection of any sort -- even simply naming an entry -- upon closing an activity. And I could live with the idea of discarding an entry if the user chooses to at exit for an unnamed entry. But I guess I need to understand the details of the interaction. As far as support for multiple users, there are some questions about the usecase I have: for example, do the students typically do a reboot in between, or just hand off the machine? -walter On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote: > > > El 03/06/16 a las 01:52, Tony Anderson escribió: > > I am not proposing to re-enable that feature. The purpose is to enable > > the user to provide a title for the Journal object. > Maybe I misunderstood. Isn't that what the name-your-journal-entry on > exit dialog used to do? > > > Why are we not using the alert which Utkarsh has implemented for the > fiddle save? It works. It looks good. He has the code in hand. > > If the purpose is the same - then - is Utkarsh's implementation better > looking? More functional? Or does it have a different purpose? > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel