2016-06-08 15:15 GMT+08:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>: > It is also the case that many deployments are very slow to update Sugar. > Some XO1s are still running versions using a version of the Sugar toolkit > that has been deprecated for almost 8 years (This is specific to XO1s since > this version of Sugar was never shipped even on XO1.5). I recently made the > decision to no longer maintain updates for that toolkit for Turtle, as a > way to ease some of the maintenance burden. > > -walter >
I guess getting back to life the *Deployment Team* may help establish an effective interaction cycle among Sugar Labs Developers and Deployments teams. The main action needed to resuscitate the Deployment team is to create an updated and complete "Deployment Contact List" for technical and administrative contact. I'm just not sure how to get this list done... > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:58 PM, <sam@sam.today> wrote: > >> Well, the XO1.75 and XO4 are arm. And aren't all ARM devices special >> snowflakes that need more kernel patches than even Ubuntu would slap on Gtk? >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: >> >> On 29 May 2016 at 22:02, Sam P. <sam@sam.today> wrote: >> >> Supporting XO1s is more than just performance though. XOs don't run >> normal, up to date versions of fedora. >> >> Why is this? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > <http://www.sugarlabs.org> > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- Laura V. I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org Identi.ca/Skype acaire IRC kaametza Happy Learning!
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
