I'll have to take your word for it on "almost 200", as the dashboard only shows me 63.
For those I can see, quality of the tasks is a problem. Several of them make no sense or are for already completed work. Yet all I can do is change the description or the instance count. I don't even know who made the tasks. The tasks need better review before they are published. There's nothing so demoralising for a student to realise they are being misguided into wasting their time. On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 10:07:21AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote: > GCI begins on 2 December. We are in pretty good shape: almost 200 tasks > published with a nice balance between Sugar Desktop, Music Blocks and > Sugarizer. (Thanks to everyone who has been helping with task creation.) > > Note that we can continue to add more tasks throughout the contest. > > Most tasks have 4-6 mentors, so I think we should have decent coverage in > terms > of feedback to the participants. Please, where as the primary channel for > communication with the participants will be IRC, try to hang out in #sugar as > much as possible. We are here to help the students learn, so please keep that > in mind. (We also expect some solid contributions to Sugar.) > > Reminder: We expect that the quality of submissions be the same as for any > contribution. Please do not sign off on tasks that are not complete or of high > quality. > > GCI is fun and productive. > > Enjoy. > > regards. > > -walter > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > [1]http://www.sugarlabs.org > [2] > > References: > > [1] http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > [2] http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel