On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 8:13 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> Thanks, that worked better. > Glad you are able to see all of the tasks now. > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5202335932874752/ is > already completed. > deleted. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5095174972112896/ is > already completed. > deleted. FWIW, I deleted two Music Blocks tasks today too as we just got PRs for them. Happens. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5752323406561280/ makes > no sense; there was no general agreement by any of the maintainers to > use this tool, and if there was, it should be attached to the specific > project not Sugar Labs in general. Perhaps something for the > oversight board rather than a GCI student. > I pushed back on this already but I though it would be good to learn a bit more about such tools. It was a research project, nothing more. Maybe we should look into GitHub actions as a means of exploring CI. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5643490613002240/ is > already assigned (to me), the cause is well understood, and anyway the > changes likely to be done aren't to configure.ac file. > Was never published as I had doubts. Thanks for clarifying. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5174561855766528/ seems > to be a duplicate of > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5990706573737984/ with > the latter being better defined. > Deleted the duplicate, which was not published. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5416369386946560/ > makes no sense because the activity does not support collaboration, > and so there's no way to test if the task was completed properly. > I didn't recall if I ever added collaboration to Story, but I think it would be a nice addition. So I rewrote the task to add collaboration. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5756584903311360/ makes > no sense; Pippy is a Fructose activity therefore it is always > installed with Sugar. > deleted. (Was never published) > > -- > > Some of the tasks I've changed; > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/6283229045194752/ was > not well explained; fixed. > +1 > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5663050028285952/ > suggested changing the style and appearance of Pippy documentation, > but as this is part of the Help activity it can't be done that way; > fixed. > +1 > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5572284450865152/ failed > to mention our trademarks and referred to Sugar Labs by the wrong > name, and didn't have enough instances; fixed. > I made some edits too. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/6240060362457088/ also > failed to mention the trademark concerns; fixed. > Yeah. Not 100% sold on this task. I have a hard time believing we'll see something worth going to the trouble of changing our logo. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5667733656567808/ can't > be done until a Port to GTK 3 is completed, so changed instance > count to zero. > We can unpublish and then publish when it is ready. > > https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5662089583001600/ lesson > plans go in the Help activity. > I was going to do a bit more cleaning up before publishing this one. > -- > > Tasks suggested; > > - complete a code review or test on someone else's pull request, with > reference to our contribution guide section for reviewers, > This is a nice idea. We need to figure out the logistics. > > - further work on Jappy, or Develop, rather than only Pippy, > Wanna wrtie something up? > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 01:17:16PM +0100, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > The 63 you're seeing might be the tasks you've been assigned to, you can > > uncheck the "My task" button below the tasks page to see all tasks. > > > > Can you point out the tasks that make no sense or are for already > completed > > work? > > > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019, 10:17 AM James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > wrote: > > > > I'll have to take your word for it on "almost 200", as the dashboard > > only shows me 63. > > > > For those I can see, quality of the tasks is a problem. > > > > Several of them make no sense or are for already completed work. > > > > Yet all I can do is change the description or the instance count. I > > don't even know who made the tasks. > > > > The tasks need better review before they are published. There's > > nothing so demoralising for a student to realise they are being > > misguided into wasting their time. > > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 10:07:21AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote: > > > GCI begins on 2 December. We are in pretty good shape: almost 200 > tasks > > > published with a nice balance between Sugar Desktop, Music Blocks > and > > > Sugarizer. (Thanks to everyone who has been helping with task > creation.) > > > > > > Note that we can continue to add more tasks throughout the contest. > > > > > > Most tasks have 4-6 mentors, so I think we should have decent > coverage in > > terms > > > of feedback to the participants. Please, where as the primary > channel for > > > communication with the participants will be IRC, try to hang out > in # > > sugar as > > > much as possible. We are here to help the students learn, so > please keep > > that > > > in mind. (We also expect some solid contributions to Sugar.) > > > > > > Reminder: We expect that the quality of submissions be the same as > for > > any > > > contribution. Please do not sign off on tasks that are not > complete or of > > high > > > quality. > > > > > > GCI is fun and productive. > > > > > > Enjoy. > > > > > > regards. > > > > > > -walter > > > > > > -- > > > Walter Bender > > > Sugar Labs > > > [1][2]http://www.sugarlabs.org > > > [2] > > > > > > References: > > > > > > [1] [3]http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > > > [2] [4]http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > > [5]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > > [6]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > [7]http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > [8]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > [9]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > References: > > > > [1] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > [2] http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > > [3] http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > > [4] http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > > [5] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > [6] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > [7] http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > [8] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > [9] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
