On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mikus Grinbergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE !!! > > I've been randomly launching Activities on 2226. __Far too many__ > of them fail -- because csound was changed, numeric was changed, > mixer was changed, etc., etc., etc. > > > Given that there *are* Activities out in the hands of users (both > with G1G1 and with country distributions), the question becomes: > > HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO AVOID USER-PERCEIVED REGRESSIONS ? > > > For what it's worth, my opinion is that if users who *had* been able > to run many different Activities were to be offered 2226, they would > be better off staying with what they have.
did these work in 708? how about in joyrides before we started slimming things down? > > mikus > > > > p.s. I started this topic to point out that "slimming down the > build" could inhibit Activities *yet to be developed*. But it turns > out that "slimming down the build" is killing *existing* Activities. slimming down the build WONT inhibit activities yet to be developed - those activities can include libraries in the XO bundles. My activity (Model) does that, so does Physics, so does Develop, and a number of other ones do too. yours, bobby > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar