> Dear Fer, 
> 
> it is not always easy to interpret this argument in the old manuscripts. The 
> old monks made frequent errors copying its. We can define the Planetary hours 
> as we like, but in the Renaissance, I have not doubt about his meaning: the 
> Planetary hours was used like the Unequal hours with add of the "planetary 
> Table" in the quadrantal instruments and in the sundials on the walls. 
> Egnatio Danti, Stoefler, Gallucci and others written about this saying that 
> the Planetary hours are the Unequal hours with the table of Planet influence. 
> I not would say that Drecker done a mistake. Maybe him say tha same thing 
> that I say. I believe that the ancient diallists done the unequal hours like 
> Drecker say, but this not meaning that the Planetary Hours are another 
> things. I remark that the Planetary hours are only a Table of influence of 
> Planets on the human body in each unequal hours.
> In the file attached is a little bit of an interesting article of Mara 
> Miniati published in the Nuncius Magazine of the Museum of the History of 
> Science in Florence, about a beautifull quadrantal instrument of Wolckmer 
> from Brunswick (1600) in which read about the construction of the unequal 
> hour by Stoefler.
> The best greetings
> Nicola
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Initial Header -----------
> 
> From      : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To          : "sundial" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc          : 
> Date      : Wed, 16 May 2007 17:33:27 +0200
> Subject : Re: Re:Greek and Roman sundials
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Nicola,
> > 
> > You are right as you say that in literature usualy the planetory hours are
> > equal to seasonal hours.
> > Nevertheless the definition by Drecker (and Sacrobosco) is worth to look at.
> > And it can be used as a timesystem.
> > If it is a practical system or it is just forgotten is another discussion.
> > 
> > Drecker certainly doesn't mean the ascendants and descendants, nor the
> > astrological houses.
> > He writes about these in separate chapters in his book and all with
> > necessary figures.
> > 
> > So I don't think Drecker made any mistake.
> > 
> > Because this timesytem interested me years ago I incorpurated them in
> > ZW2000.
> > The output is just as in a figure by Drecker.
> > 
> > Best wishes, Fer.
> > 
> > 
> > Fer J. de Vries
> > 
> > De Zonnewijzerkring
> > http://www.de-zonnewijzerkring.nl
> > 
> > Molens
> > http://www.collsemolen.dse.nl
> > 
> > Eindhoven, Netherlands
> > lat.  51:30 N      long.  5:30 E
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "ferdevries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "noamk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "sundial" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 4:55 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re:Greek and Roman sundials
> > 
> > 
> > > Dear Fer and Noam,
> > >
> > > I doubt of Drecker. I am sorry for my incapacity to write in correct
> > > english as it is not easy for me write about this in english. In any case,
> > > you write:
> > > "Drecker defines the planetary hours in his book as the rise of 15 degrees
> > > on  the ecliptica. He makes a note in his book to a definition by
> > > Sacrobosco (around 1230)."
> > >
> > > Ok, I think that Drecker have done a mistake. The hours of Drecker
> > > definition I believe to be the "Ascendant and Discendant zodiacals signs"
> > > and the Celestial Houses, but the Planetary House in the Renaissance are
> > > the same that the Seasonal hours, but udes only for the influence of
> > > planetes in each hours. In the astrolabes the unequal hours was used like
> > > in the ancient time. Some time the astrologers and astronomery and
> > > diallista used the name "planetary" hours to point out the "seasonal
> > > hours" in the sundials. But in reality the Planetary hours are the ancient
> > > unequal hours used for read the astral influence of planets about the
> > > human body.
> > > The best greetings, Nicola
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Initial Header -----------
> > >
> > >>From      : "fer de vries" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To          : "Severino, Nicola" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"noamk1"
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc          : "sundial" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Date      : Wed, 16 May 2007 10:03:41 +0200
> > > Subject : Re: Re:Greek and Roman sundials
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Nicola,
> > >>
> > >> In this discussion you write:
> > >>
> > >> "The Planetary hours are equal to the seasonal hours ......"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> In most of the literature this is true but according to Joseph Drecker
> > >> (1925)  the planetary hours are different from seasonal hours.
> > >>
> > >> Drecker defines the planetary hours in his book as the rise of 15 degrees
> > >> on
> > >> the ecliptica.
> > >> He makes a note in his book to a definition by Sacrobosco (around 1230).
> > >>
> > >> There are 12 hours in the day and in the night but because a sign rises
> > >> fast
> > >> or slow the lenght of each hour is different in the same day too.
> > >>
> > >> With my program ZW2000 these planetary hours can be calculted.
> > >> They look strange and are not so easy to use in practice and rather
> > >> difficult to construct.
> > >> Calculation today with computer is easy.
> > >>
> > >> So far as I know this timesytem isn't seen on any real sundial.
> > >>
> > >> Best wishes, Fer.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Fer J. de Vries
> > >>
> > >> De Zonnewijzerkring
> > >> http://www.de-zonnewijzerkring.nl
> > >>
> > >> Molens
> > >> http://www.collsemolen.dse.nl
> > >>
> > >> Eindhoven, Netherlands
> > >> lat.  51:30 N      long.  5:30 E
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> To: "noamk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Cc: "sundial" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:24 AM
> > >> Subject: Re:Greek and Roman sundials
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > You wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > "This is why there is a difference between seasonal and planetary
> > >> > hours...".
> > >> >
> > >> > Where is the difference between seasonal and planetary hours?
> > >> > The Planetary hours are egual to the seasonal hours and are differently
> > >> > only for a philosophical and astrological concepts. All treatises of
> > >> > gnomonica on XVI-XVI-XVIIth century described the Planetary hours only
> > >> > for
> > >> > the astrological concepts. For this you can see Clavius, Vimercato,
> > >> > Kircher, etc.
> > >> > Nicola
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ---------- Initial Header -----------
> > >> >
> > >> >>From      : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > To          : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Cc          :
> > >> > Date      : Tue, 15 May 2007 22:37:10 +0300
> > >> > Subject : Greek and Roman sundials
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> I think my question may not have been clear. What I am interested in
> > >> >> finding out is
> > >> >> 1) Greek and roman sundials break up the day into 12 equal parts but
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> amount of time that will pass between each part will not be equal as
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> first and last hour will be longer by approximately 5 minutes due to
> > >> >> refraction. This is why there is a difference between seasonal and
> > >> >> planetary hours
> > >> >> 2) If a Greek or Roman sundial was set up correctly according to what
> > >> >> they thought was correct, would it actually tell seasonal hours
> > >> >> accurately or not?
> > >> >> The part that makes me wonder is the angle of the gnomon.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 3) Is there any formula to calculate what would be the seasonal time
> > >> >> on a
> > >> >> Greek sundial that was accurately set up?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Fred Sawyer gives the formula for the unequal hours
> > >> >> http://www.sundials.org/publications/dcomp/dcomp2.htm
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks again,
> > >> >> Noam Kaplan
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > >> >> From: Noam Kaplan
> > >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 2:25 PM
> > >> >> Subject: Greek and Roman sundials
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Does anyone know if the Greek and Roman sundials would in actuality
> > >> >> show
> > >> >> what they are theoretically supposed to show in term of the unequal
> > >> >> hours?  The gnomon was either horizontal or vertical, not on an angle.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >> Noam Kaplan
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > Leggi GRATIS le tue mail con il telefonino i-modeT di Wind
> > >> > http://i-mode.wind.it/
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > >> > https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > > Leggi GRATIS le tue mail con il telefonino i-modeT di Wind
> > > http://i-mode.wind.it/
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Passa a Infostrada. ADSL e Telefono senza limiti e senza canone Telecom
> http://click.libero.it/infostrada
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------
Passa a Infostrada. ADSL e Telefono senza limiti e senza canone Telecom
http://click.libero.it/infostrada



---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to