That's still around one part in 10^8 over a year, not quite 6 decimal places of 
days, but very close!

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 26, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Brooke Clarke <bro...@pacific.net> wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> It turns out that because of "seeing" you can not determine meridian crossing 
> to better than about  5 arc seconds (5 * 55 ms of time).  (The exception is 
> for locations at high elevations or in space.)  I've heard that modern CCD 
> cameras can image sections of the sky and fit the image to a very good star 
> catalog thus averaging the seeing of hundreds of stars and get orders of 
> magnitude better time/space resolution.
> http://www.prc68.com/I/StellarTime.shtml
> 
> Have Fun,
> 
> Brooke Clarke
> http://www.PRC68.com
> 
> 
> Kevin Karney wrote:
>> Brent
>> If you measure the transit of a star (or any celestial body) through the 
>> meridian again and again over many years with telescopes that can 
>> distinguish less than 1 second of arc, then it's perfectly possible. 
>> Remember 1 second of time = 15 seconds of arc. These measurements - now done 
>> automatically -  have been done for years by using transit telescopes to 
>> take photographs of the stars and then by taking measurements off the photo 
>> plates.
>> 
>> Even without sophisticated instruments, surprising accuracies were 
>> obtained...
>> 
>>   
>>> Malik Shah the grandson of Toghril Beg, the founder of the Seljuk dynasty 
>>> ruled the city of Isfahan from 1073 AD. His vizier Nizam-ul-Mulk invited 
>>> Omar Khayyam to Isfahan, to set up an observatory. Other leading 
>>> astronomers were also invited to work at the observatory and for 18 years 
>>> Omar Khayyam led the scientists and produced work of outstanding quality. 
>>> It was a period of peace during which the political situation allowed 
>>> Khayyam the opportunity to devote himself entirely to his scholarly work. 
>>> During this time Khayyam led work on compiling astronomical tables and he 
>>> also contributed to calendar reform in 1079. Khayyam measured the length of 
>>> the year as 365.24219858156 days, we know now that the length of the year 
>>> is changing in the sixth decimal place over a person's lifetime. It is also 
>>> outstandingly accurate. For comparison the length of the year at the end of 
>>> the 19th century was 365.242196 days, while today it is 365.242190 days.
>>>     
>> Omar Khayyam was a real polymath - a notable astronomer, mathematical and 
>> poet. He famously wrote ....
>> 
>>   
>>> A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,
>>> A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of
>>> Beside me singing in the Wilderness --
>>> Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow!
>>>     
>> and (especially for us gnomonists)
>> 
>>   
>>> For in and out, above, about, below,
>>> ’Tis nothing but a magic shadow-show,
>>> Play’d in a box whose candle is the Sun,
>>> Round which we phantom Figures come and go
>>>     
>> Best regards
>> Kevin Karney
>> Freedom Cottage, Llandogo, Monmouth NP25 4TP, Wales, UK
>> 51° 44' N 2° 41' W Zone 0
>> + 44 1594 530 595
>> 
>> On 26 Mar 2011, at 13:57, Brent wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> It's amazing that someone was able to calculate these
>>> numbers out to 6 decimals. Is that done by some type of
>>> observation or is it mathematics?
>>> 
>>> How could you possibly measure something like that?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/25/2011 1:14 PM, Kevin Karney wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Nothing is constant in the heavens !
>>>> The 'tropical' year (from equinox to equinox) is 365.242190 days
>>>> The 'sidereal' year (fixed star to fixed star) is 365.256363 days
>>>> The 'anomalistic' year (perihelion to perihelion) is 365.259636 days - 
>>>> cycling over a period of some 21000 years
>>>> (values for 2009 from Astronomical Almanac)
>>>> But these are mean values having averaged out the effects of nutation (the 
>>>> wobbling of the Earth's axis) and various other effects.
>>>>       
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>> 
>>>     
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
> 
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to