Jimmy Fox writes:

   The MTU was at 1500. I set it to 1400 and even 1300 but I have the
   same results. This is a point to point connection without a VPN
   connection. I would think the 1500 packet would be optimum. This is
   the size we had before the upgrade.
   
This is perhaps unrelated, but we were never able to solve our latency
problems with the Ray 1 in a scenario where there is very good
networking and only a single switch stack between the Ray and server.

The odd thing is that we get outstanding performance if we use an
inexpensive netgear GS108 direct to the server (a Sun X4200), or if we
route through a system with Rays running on one of the interfaces and
the world out the other.  Networking tested 100 Mb/s ports, different
switches, etc.  Their side sees nothing wrong at the Cisco switches.

Our workarounds were to route through other machines (as described above)
or move to Ray 2.

-- 
Darrel Hankerson
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to