Videos, especially Flash. Because of YouTube, users want this more than they used to. It's also a reasonable expectation of a modern machine, and we are always in the situation where replacing any workstation should mean that the new system put there will do better than the old one, thin or fat. Users don't care what's there, they just want to see it all work.
We are actually looking at an expanded use of thin clients at the Johns Hopkins undergraduate/Homewood campus and I can say that if the new Sun Ray models can do better with video than the current generation, that will weigh heavily in favor of the Sun Ray. While I have not yet personally seen them, I have heard reports that a demo of HP thin clients (which are probably not as thin) worked well on the video front. William Yang > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent Peacock > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:37 PM > To: SunRay-Users mailing list > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives > > On 03/25/10 19:10, David Koelmeyer wrote: > > Livery needs some work :P > > > > But seriously, excited to see this - sure hope it's got some > > decent graphics processing built into it. > > Why? What do you plan to do with i? > > Kent > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
