You wouldn't happen to know which types of wireless (802.11abgn) and security modes (open/WEP/WPA/WPA2 pre-shared key, PEAP, CHAP, etc.) are supported would you?
William Yang > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Beeler > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:52 AM > To: SunRay-Users mailing list > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives > > I have 2 Sun Ray 3's in my possession at work. We are doing testing of > the units for Sun/Oracle for them. They are great! Obviously they > support 4 monitors instead of two, they have a SFP port to put a GBIC in > place for fiber, and finally they put a darn power button on a Sun Ray! > Plus they have definitely worked on the graphics performance, flash and > what not seems definitely faster and the overall picture quality is much > better. Also you can get them with wireless built in if your > environment permits. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Koelmeyer > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:13 AM > To: SunRay-Users mailing list > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives > > Precisely - thanks for summing that up nicely William. Not just Flash, > but > video content in general. > > I also have daydreams about a thin client/zero-configuration device that > could support a virtual 3D learning environment, such as (or could have > been) delivered by Sun's own Project Wonderland effort (now Open > Wonderland). > > > On 26/03/10 04:12 PM, William Yang wrote: > > Videos, especially Flash. Because of YouTube, users want this more > than > > they used to. It's also a reasonable expectation of a modern machine, > and > > we are always in the situation where replacing any workstation should > mean > > that the new system put there will do better than the old one, thin or > fat. > > Users don't care what's there, they just want to see it all work. > > > > We are actually looking at an expanded use of thin clients at the > Johns > > Hopkins undergraduate/Homewood campus and I can say that if the new > Sun Ray > > models can do better with video than the current generation, that will > weigh > > heavily in favor of the Sun Ray. While I have not yet personally seen > them, > > I have heard reports that a demo of HP thin clients (which are > probably not > > as thin) worked well on the video front. > > > > William Yang > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users- > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent Peacock > >> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:37 PM > >> To: SunRay-Users mailing list > >> Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives > >> > >> On 03/25/10 19:10, David Koelmeyer wrote: > >> > >>> Livery needs some work :P > >>> > >>> But seriously, excited to see this - sure hope it's got some > >>> decent graphics processing built into it. > >>> > >> Why? What do you plan to do with i? > >> > >> Kent-- > Kind Regards, > Dave Koelmeyer > == > Senior IT Technician > Faculty of Engineering Administration, University of Auckland > > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
