Hi Thomas,
I expect I'll pass on it, I'm sure SGD is excellent, but as a tiny
operation, dealing with the big boys can be torturous. Sun was OK, IBM has
been largely impossible to navigate, the moment I express my tiny budget,
they practically hung up on me!

If I can deal with a much smaller shop like Axel, I'll grab that
opportunity with both hands...

Cheers

Garry


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Fuerle, Thomas <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Garry,****
>
> ** **
>
> it’s worth a look, our first Oracle VDI license contained also the right
> to use SGD. We use SGD as the Backup System for external Users to connect
> to WTS 2008 R2, if the Sun Ray Server dies for some reason.****
>
> ** **
>
> Anyway the current version still uses java runtime on the client instead
> of HTML5, which makes me not to happy except for iPads, which can connect
> without Java.****
>
> ** **
>
> But I admit, *even if Secure Global Desktop is safe, it's left a bad
> taste in my mouth really.*
>
> * *
>
> *regards, thomas*****
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Garry Taylor
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2013 12:53
> *An:* SunRay-Users mailing list
> *Betreff:* Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray alternatives?****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Curtis,****
>
> Thanks for the info, to be honest I think I'd probably rather steer clear
> of Oracle stuff. With what happened with Sun Ray, even if Secure Global
> Desktop is safe, it's left a bad taste in my mouth really. Also, we're a
> very small operation, and although our Sun rep. was pretty helpful, I can't
> really see Oracle feeling the same way about the pennies we'll send their
> way!****
>
> ** **
>
> At the moment I'm looking at Axel devices, like the AX3000, they might be
> perfect for me, I expect I'll get one to try out. Axel are a small company
> too, so probably a bit more inclined to deal with other small companies.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers****
>
> ** **
>
> Garry****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Curtis Cunningham <
> [email protected]> wrote:****
>
> Hi  Garry,****
>
> ** **
>
> long time lurker here, but felt I could offer input, this (Secure Global
> Desktop, aka Tarantella) may be able to help you:****
>
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/virtualization/secure-global-desktop/overview/index.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> be sure to check out the details on the resources page here:****
>
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/virtualization/secure-global-desktop/resources/index.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> product documentation here:****
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37459_01/index.html****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes ironically it's another Oracle product, but the reports are that this
> will stick around. I worked as a developer on this when it was originally
> Tarantella, and it's been around a long time, very mature, very stable.
> Higher profit margins (no hardware component) makes me optimistic this will
> persist. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm suggesting it based purely on your stated requirements, which didn't
> include using only a Sun Ray hardware device, so if you have other more
> conventional clients your users can use, then this may work for you. It'll
> work from the smallest seat installation ( a handful of seats) to thousands
> of concurrent users and has been doing that for about a decade.
> Authentication methods are super flexible (LDAP, AD, local UNIX
> groups/users, anonymous/ kiosk style), application persistence is highly
> configurable (including never ending the session unless the user kills the
> app/ desktop instance). ****
>
> ** **
>
> Good luck!
> Curtis.****
>
> ** **
>
> ~~****
>
> Curtis Cunningham****
>
> email: [email protected]****
>
> web: http://curtiscunningham.com****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 6:19 AM, Garry Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> OK, before I go ahead and buy another Sun Ray... With the bad news about
> Sun Ray's future, it makes sense to check out the alternatives. My needs
> are fairly basic:****
>
> ** **
>
> We run Solaris 10 on SPARC, this will not change.****
>
> ** **
>
> We need to maintain a persistent desktop on this server, and have able to
> be accessed by several people in worldwide locations, does not need to be
> at the same time though. The desktop should persist all of the time, no
> logouts, when another user wants to use the desktop, it's simply moved to
> their client, and removed from the other user. This is how our Sun Ray set
> up works right now.****
>
> ** **
>
> We run  a CDE/Solaris desktop, no need for Windows.****
>
> ** **
>
> Does not need to be fast, just needs to work.****
>
> ** **
>
> So what exactly are the options here? Wyse, nComputing? I really don't
> know. Sun Ray has been perfect for us for years, and I've never looked into
> anything else. RealVNC?****
>
> ** **
>
> The critical part is the desktop cannot need to be logged out to transfer
> to another thin client.****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers****
>
> ** **
>
> Garry****
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users****
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to