Bill Davidsen wrote: >I saw these today: >http://www.infoworld.com/article/09/02/26/Safari_4_rivals_Google_Chrome_in_JavaScript_race_1.html?source=NLC-DAILY&cgd=2009-02-26 >http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9128512 > >and I do think that there are people who will choose a browser >based on rendering speed. And as more applications are written in JS >I suppose "rendering" is evolving into "application program execution" >instead. > >Based on some minimal testing by friends >(I have neither Mac nor Windows) and a little of my own >(running Chrome under WINE) I have to say that the figures of 3x faster >seem to be at least "in the ballpark" correct, >and browsers based on the Webkit code seem to benefit.
NoScript will yield *really* fast rendering speeds. (Most of what is served via .js is crap.) Only when Chrome has extensions (first and foremost: AdBlock) does it becomes a player. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
