"..<new>. .Form Manager seem to be hard for people to grasp.."
No! its just it is not as usable as the previous, most of us have seen it in firefox. Many of us used SM 1.x because of the presence of form manger. The "new" one doesn't handle whole forms, requires an extension to get minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used existing part of SM. < sigh>.. bring back form manger. On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski <b...@spikowski.com> wrote: >Philip Chee wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote: >> >>> Restore the old Form Manager! >>> ...please... >> >> We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday. >> >> <https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final> >> >> Look under the feedback section. > > >That's great news -- I'll bet there's an awful lot of who haven't switched to >2.0 simply because of the loss of the truly excellent form manager in the 1.n >series. > >When colleagues ask me why I rely on software as little known as Seamonkey, I >give several compelling reasons -- the form manager has always been #1 (and >the support from this newsgroup is #2 -- thanks to you all!). _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey