Tom Pamin wrote:
me2 wrote:
"..<new>. .Form Manager seem to be hard for people to grasp.."
No! its just it is not as usable as the previous, most of us have seen
it in firefox. Many of us used SM 1.x because of the presence of form
manger.
The "new" one doesn't handle whole forms, requires an extension to get
minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used
existing part of SM.
< sigh>.. bring back form manger.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski
<b...@spikowski.com> wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
Restore the old Form Manager!
...please...
We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final>
Look under the feedback section.
That's great news -- I'll bet there's an awful lot of who haven't
switched to 2.0 simply because of the loss of the truly excellent
form manager in the 1.n series.
When colleagues ask me why I rely on software as little known as
Seamonkey, I give several compelling reasons -- the form manager has
always been #1 (and the support from this newsgroup is #2 -- thanks
to you all!).
I agree - we NEED the old Form Manager back. I won't switch to 2.0
without it.
I'd like to see the SM 1.x.x Form Manager in Firefox,too!
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
