On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:13:49 -0500, hawker wrote: > On 12/15/2009 9:15 PM, Martin Freitag wrote: >>> I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on >>> Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but >>> with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting >>> Seamonkey >> >> Which ones? Most popular extensions which worked in SM1 do work (some >> need compatibility enforcement) or have an equivalent in my opinion. >> > > There are a few, the biggest one is that Image Zoom 0.4 dropped SM > support and 0.3x works on 1.1.x but not 2.x.
My Image Zoom 0.3-mod still works in SeaMonkey 2.0 except that the context menu doesn't work. <http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#imagezoom> Meanwhile I'll look into porting 0.4 ================= Added since 0.3.1 * Added Image Rotate Functions - Firefox Only * Removed support for Flock, Netscape, Seamonkey, Mozilla ================= ?? curses! Now where did I put the cluebat.... Phil -- Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.c...@gmail.com> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]Logic means arriving at wrong conclusions with assurance. * TagZilla 0.066.6 _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
