On 3/22/2010 9:19 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Mark Hansen wrote: >> On 3/21/2010 7:23 AM, Benoit Renard wrote: >>> Robert Kaiser wrote: >>>> Benoit Renard schrieb: >>>>> As another user demonstrated, the subject line makes >>>>> one think that support has been dropped, and that's it. >>>> And that's exactly what the announcement intended to do. Success on all >>>> targets. >>> Except that your announcement contradicts this, because it also >>> announces that for those who want to stay with 1.1.x that 1.1.19 is >>> available. Or do you really want everyone to stay with 1.1.18 and have >>> all the work on 1.1.19 be for nothing? >> >> Huh? Where did you get that? Did you even read the announcement? It >> really doesn't sounds like it. >> >> For example, as part of that message, he said (paraphrased): >> >> SM 1.x is really old. > > Given that 2.x release is only out less than a year, that's political spin > more > than any conventional understanding of "really old." v1.1.17 was released in > about June of last year, 1.1.18 after that. A serious form filler has only > been > out a few months, so many people couldn't think of migrating before that.
I think the original message was referring to 1.X as a product line. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
