Bernard Mercier a écrit : > I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. > A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it > is not secure enough.........................*
> I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. > SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. > Is this a valid test link? > Are there others? > What is your opinion? The person was merely speaking about the End Of Life of SM 1.x -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
