Robert Kaiser a exposé le 31/03/2010 : > Bernard Mercier wrote: >> I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. >> A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it >> is not secure enough.........................* >> >> I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. >> SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. >> >> Is this a valid test link? >> Are there others? >> What is your opinion?
> Not sure of how much value that test is, but I can tell you there are no > known/published security vulnerabilities affecting SeaMonkey 2.0.4 at > this point (there are some affecting 2.0.3 which are fixed in 2.0.4), > but there are a number affecting every 1.x release, including 1.1.19. > The most current 2.0 release is as secure as it can get for a browser or > mail client right now, to our knowledge. > Robert Kaiser Thank you for your reply. Would you have another link to site which test browsers? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
