JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Standards are a Good Thing(tm).
Using the W3C Validator on your code is also a Good Thing(tm).
The word for those who don't do that is "incompetent".
Rick Merrill wrote:
But that is a totally toothless motto.
Sorry. It's the best I have.
While I agree with you,
the fact is that the non-compliant are getting the money
That is exactly my gripe.
and the "competent" do not.
Not true. They are, however, outnumbered.
Case in point: those websites developed
with TOOLS that do not adhere to the standards.
Yup. Examples I like to use:
If these bozos were plumbers or electricians
and produced work of the low quality they do,
they would have had their licenses yanked long ago.
...and even the gal who does your wife's nails
had to pass a standardized test to be allowed to do that.
Enforcement is the issue: often that gal's license is not
checked until a customer catches salmoella.
Suppose there were a 'helper' app that flagged non-compliant
websites for the user?!
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
