Jay Garcia wrote:
On 21.09.2010 10:11, Ray_Net wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote:
--- Original Message ---
W3BNR wrote:
On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation.
I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user
found.
You are not looking hard enough. Look harder. I fixed the following
bugs:
Bug 86400 reported by David Carroll
Bug 156734 reported by Jeremy M. Dolan
Bug 388349 reported by Ed
Bug 395371 reported by arno renevier
Bug 414014 reported by Eyal Rozenberg
Bug 482433 reported by Chris Wimlett
Bug 534248 reported by Aleksej
Bug 534322 reported by Kevin Brosnan
Actually I fixed more but I got bored searching through bugzilla.
Could you fix this
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595696
or tell me how can i fix it
"Bug" 218258 - only 28 votes in 7 years? I don't think it will get
"fixed". More of a new feature request than a bug.
Only 28 votes .... and you forgot the huge list of bugs closed because a
duplicate of this one.
Anyhow 'gator' on April 4, 2010, suggested a work-a-round. See comment
#61 at the bug page. This should satisfy the few that need the
function.
NO this doesnot statify the request - In addition the asked thing is
already coded in the forward mechanism - this mechanism could be easely
called when doing a "reply" - this not a great job to be done.
You speak about the fact that this bug should be an RFE .... this why i
created https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595696 which is a
RFE ... this RFE will stay at it is for another cycle of 7 years or
more. As Phillip Jones said: 'developers believe that users can't know
what they want, that only developers know what users want. And tend to
ignore users wishes.' and i add : Evenwhile if the work to be done is
mimimal.
If it's "minimal" than add a comment to your RFE explaining the minimal
steps in detail so that programmers reading it will get it and do it in
their spare time.
if you read the text, you will imediately see that's a minimal work - in
short:
1. Create an option named "Reply-header-like-forward" and use it when
replying to a mail is this way:
If Reply-header-like-forward is true then
call<forward-header-composition>;
---------------------------
If i know how to modify SeaMonkey, i can give a try.
That is not programming steps needed to upgrade the module(s) necessary
to effect the change(s). If it's that simple then do it.
If someone told me not to do it, but how i can participate for the
coding .... i can try to implement it.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
