On 1/9/11 12:37 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> Ray_Net schrieb:
>>> Why they put this txt file
>>> into a file that cannot be used by notepad.exe ?
>>
>> Because a database is faster for accessing specific data, needs less
>> memory (we don't need to parse and analyze all data just to display some
>> part of it), allows more efficient and flexible organization (like tags)
>> easily and enables better exchange for things like Sync.
>>
> I am using 2.0.x with the flat file bookmarks.html without noticing any 
> slowdown of SM. SM is slow in other parts.
> IMHO - BTW the actual bookmarks.html have too many unneeded extra items 
> attached per entry. the only need things is a "choiced name" the "url" 
> and eventually a directory tree.

I disagree.

Several of my bookmarks also have comments.  For example, I usually
enable images only from the requested domain, but I have comments on
some bookmarks "requires all images" .

Also, I sometimes want to see the last time I went to a bookmarked site.
 No, I don't want to go to my history file and compare URIs with my
bookmarks.  In any case, I retain history only 45 days.

-- 

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to