On 5/29/11 6:35 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC.
>
> It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply
> clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for
> compatibility. Then it froze (although no biggie). After a reboot I
> relaunched SeaMonkey and all my previous settings were there (bookmarks,
> emails, passwords, cookies).
>
> The main improvement in SeaMonkey is speed. It is very noticeably faster
> than 2.0.
>
> BTW I am using an iMac (late 2006 24") running OS X 10.6.7 with 2 GB memory.
>
> Try the 2.1 version of SeaMonkey. Even though it is still a RC (release
> candidate) it is very stable on my Mac.
>
> Many thanks to all the SeaMonkey and Mozilla developers for the good
> work with SeaMonkey 2.1 RC.
>
> What are other users experiences with SeaMonkey 2.1 RC?
Since I installed SM 2.1RC1 on 13 May, I have submitted 13 bug reports.
Only 8 are actually against SeaMonkey itself. The others are against
Core and Toolkit, but I noticed them only because I had installed SM
2.1RC1.
I categorized only two of the actual SeaMonkey bug reports as "major",
there being no possible workaround. One is "normal", two are "minor",
one is "trivial", and one is an RFE ("request for enhancement".
Overall, I would consider SM 2.1RC1 to be good but not great.
The "major" bug reports:
#658936 at <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658936>
#659731 at <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659731>
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>
On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
