Ant wrote: > Hi again! > > Is anyone else noticing v2.10.1 uses a lot more memory than v2.0.14 and > earlier? I saw my new SM installation and profile went high as 1.5-1.6 > (peak) GB in my old, updated 32-bit Windows XP Pro. SP3 machine (2.5 GB > of RAM). This was I surfing, watching videos, using tabs, etc. a lot. I > didn't use the computer overnight (about 9.5 hours). My extension > collection is smaller than v2.0.14's:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and find out what is using up the memory! Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown. Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in 2.0.14) If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you can identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning: if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames which use memory) -- ~Justin Wood (Callek) _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
