On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:48:54 -0400, WaltS wrote: > On 11/02/2012 01:03 AM, Ant wrote: >> On 11/1/2012 8:33 AM PT, WaltS typed: >> >>>>>> How's that 64-bit one? Can you tell any differences from the 32-bit >>>>>> one? >>>>> >>>>> It looks prettier. >>>> >>>> Prettier? How so? >>> >>> Here are the differences in look. >>> >>> First 32-bit Browser and Mail >>> >>> http://imgur.com/ndvg1 >>> >>> http://imgur.com/O9nt3 >>> >>> 64-bit >>> >>> http://imgur.com/N6caz >>> >>> http://imgur.com/m5f8Q >> >> Wow. Was 64-bit compiled with different libraries or something? What >> about speeds and stuff? ;) >> > > You will have to ask the builder of the 64-bit contributed build. I have > no clue. > > I don't use SeaMonkey but haven't noticed any differences in speed and > stuff between the 32-bit and 64-bit Firefox or Thunderbird. > > They all just look nicer, and since I use Linux have the option.
AFAICT the visual differences are due to the OS theming. The default/classic theme in SeaMonkey is designed to use the native OS widgets and theming as much as possible. I'd guess that your 32bit box is using a different OS theme compared to your 64 bit box. > Windows users are stuck with the 32-bit builds. Phil -- Philip Chee <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
