On 11/02/2012 10:15 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:48:54 -0400, WaltS wrote:
On 11/02/2012 01:03 AM, Ant wrote:
On 11/1/2012 8:33 AM PT, WaltS typed:
How's that 64-bit one? Can you tell any differences from the 32-bit
one?
It looks prettier.
Prettier? How so?
Here are the differences in look.
First 32-bit Browser and Mail
http://imgur.com/ndvg1
http://imgur.com/O9nt3
64-bit
http://imgur.com/N6caz
http://imgur.com/m5f8Q
Wow. Was 64-bit compiled with different libraries or something? What
about speeds and stuff? ;)
You will have to ask the builder of the 64-bit contributed build. I have
no clue.
I don't use SeaMonkey but haven't noticed any differences in speed and
stuff between the 32-bit and 64-bit Firefox or Thunderbird.
They all just look nicer, and since I use Linux have the option.
AFAICT the visual differences are due to the OS theming. The
default/classic theme in SeaMonkey is designed to use the native OS
widgets and theming as much as possible. I'd guess that your 32bit box
is using a different OS theme compared to your 64 bit box.
Windows users are stuck with the 32-bit builds.
Phil
Interesting, as I have one 64-bit box. They do look different in the
Gnome desktop.
The screen shots where taken running SM on the KDE 4.9.2 desktop, using
the Oxygen theme and widgets, oxygen-gtk widget style and icons.
I am sure I could make all my apps appear different using others.
--
Fedora 17 (64-bit) KDE 4.9.2
Thunderbird Beta (17.0) Install and test it.
One state should not determine an election.
http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
