On 12/23/2018 06:12 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> In any case, I think it would be better to spend effort into
migration to
> something future oriented, even if it means to lose loved features or
> functionality, than to spend the effort in keeping something outdated
alive.
Personally my heart isn't into this. Even while paving the way to 2.57 I
am always going to add this and that to 2.53 because that is for me the
version where everything still works.
I date back back to Netscape 4. I use SeaMonkey because it kept a *VERY*
neat functional user interface {*LACKING* Firefox/Thunderbird}. I
particularly want to have browser and email in the same package. I even
occasionally use Composer. I don't have a current programming skill set
- 8080/8085 assembler primarily ;/
Browsers seem to be heading in the maximize glitz/glitter for for the
pure sake of playing with new toys. (end minor rant ;)
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
