On 12/24/2018 5:17 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/23/2018 06:12 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> In any case, I think it would be better to spend effort into
migration to
> something future oriented, even if it means to lose loved features or
> functionality, than to spend the effort in keeping something
outdated alive.
Personally my heart isn't into this. Even while paving the way to 2.57
I am always going to add this and that to 2.53 because that is for me
the version where everything still works.
I date back back to Netscape 4. I use SeaMonkey because it kept a *VERY*
neat functional user interface {*LACKING* Firefox/Thunderbird}. I
particularly want to have browser and email in the same package. I even
occasionally use Composer. I don't have a current programming skill set
- 8080/8085 assembler primarily ;/
I went further back since Netscape v2 days. I agree with its GUI design.
People think I am crazy for using bloated suites.
--
Season's Greetings/Happy Holidays/Merry Christmas (Jesus' birthday)!
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see
this signature correctly.
/\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
/ /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
| |o o| | Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ / Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
( )
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
