Hundreds of projects? Such as? None of them comes anywhere near to our
techology; most of them are either easily harvestable and blockable
proxy networks, or WASTE clones.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:47:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was
> shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I
> don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for
> freenet....but it might be worth looking in to.
> 
> Also just wanna add that I fully support the desire to help get around
> the chinese firewalls and stuff....but you're one of hundreds of
> projects working on that same goal....and personally, I'm not using
> 0.7 until there's a working opennet. As much as it may seem like I'm
> totally against darknets....it's not so much what you're working on,
> it's how. I still feel quite strongly that the main page should send
> new users to a download page for 0.5, not 0.7. As for the issue of
> getting a working opennet...I'll join the other people in backing
> off....I suppose I can wait another year or so for a new version....I
> just hope 0.5 will last that long without any fresh users.
> 
> On 8/30/06, David 'Bombe' Roden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:35, inverse wrote:
> >
> >> beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's
> >> homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be
> >> filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this is
> >> exactly what's happening in China.
> >
> >Yes, the session bytes that are used to initiate connections are
> >typical.
> >
> >
> >> Public-key encrypted communications show constant patterns the moment
> >> a public key is exchanged between hosts.
> >
> >Communication between 0.7 nodes doesn't have to exchange public keys,
> >those are already known as they are contained in the node reference.
> >
> >
> >        David
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Support mailing list
> >Support@freenetproject.org
> >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> >Unsubscribe at 
> >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> <HTML>
> <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&amp;id=0&amp;t=57";><img
> border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!"
> src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif"/></a>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at 
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to