On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:59:43 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 26 January 2011 19:42:38 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:38:55 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On Monday 24 January 2011 22:28:36 you wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:29:14 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1336 is now available. Please upgrade, it > > > > > will be mandatory on Friday. Much of this build is intended to > > > > > try to improve network performance and particularly to prevent > > > > > transfer failures especially on realtime requests. > > > > > > > > > > Details: > > > > > - Fix some block transfer bugs related to transfer coalescing, > > > > > disconnects and reassigning to self after a request has taken > > > > > too long. > > > > > - Keep on transferring the data if we need it for a local > > > > > request, and explain why this is safe in comments. However it > > > > > will go away when we get rid of receiver-side transfer > > > > > cancels anyway. > > > > > - Fix even more bugs related to request forking on timeout. > > > > > - Always drop the queued messages when we disconnect due to a > > > > > timeout. > > > > > - Eliminate turtle transfers, they are no longer necessary and > > > > > involve unnecessary complexity and transfer cancels. We will > > > > > soon eliminate receiver cancels too which will further > > > > > simplify matters. > > > > > - Remove timed out filters more often. > > > > > - Show totals for backoff times. > > > > > - Fixes to auto-testing code. > > > > > > > > This build still can't manage to handle input bandwidth sanely, > > > > on a congested connection -- it entirely consumes my already > > > > busy connection. (Aka. my freenet is still unusable here.) > > > > > > Limiting input bandwidth usage accurately is extraordinarily > > > difficult and most people have fat pipes downstream. > > > > > > Probably your peers are resending packets constantly. > > > > So, umm, make them stop, after say a minute of flooding? > > > And disconnect completely? That kind of defeats the point doesn't it?
No, that doesn't defeat the point. The point is to have a running Freenet, which is simply not possible at the moment, since it will flood my internet connection to an unusable state. Moreover, what's the problem with "completely disconnecting" from a peer, after it continues to flood us for many minutes? _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
