On Friday 03 Aug 2012 02:16:02 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:07:11 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > [...] > > - Post your wrapper.log. You might want to look for anything > > incriminating (e.g. look for "@" to find keys), [...] > > How about not logging anything incriminating by default? No port > numbers, no keys, no nothing like that?
Keys shouldn't be logged in wrapper.log generally. It has happened on occasion due to debug code; it's a small risk and I can't guarantee that it won't be seen. Stack traces often include request UIDs, not sure about keys. Port numbers are a bit of a problem and we have a bug filed to clean up code related to port numbers ... I dunno if they are logged, but in any case we have alerts about them etc which need a bit more warning ... how to deal with this clearly without having too much text is unclear...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
