We will make sure that such things can easily be implemented by third party utilities by changing the bandwidth limit on the fly through FCP... but actually including a scheduler is not something I would want to block 0.7. I don't know whether we'd want one later.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:52:20AM -0500, Anonymous wrote: > > Hi, > > My earlier question is a good start but I think in Freenet 0.7 it would be > good if a simple scheduler is implemented. This should allow different > configs to be used at different time. This would mean that we can specificy > different bandwidth limits at different times. Since FreeNet is supposed to > run all the time, this will be useful for people with slow connections, > shared connections and different data charges for different times. I hope you > consider this suggestion for FreeNet 0.7 -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20051219/272f9a42/attachment.pgp>
