-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: |>> ~ - binning the finegrained module packaging and having the modules |>> all |>> inside the kernel package |>> |> nope. |> |>> ~ - if not, making some modules dependencies of the kernel package |>> |> yes. |> |>> ~ - doing a depmod post-install or update of a kernel module package? |>> |> yes. | | i second that.
Opinions are interesting but frankly useless to me without some explanation of why you came to think like that. Sometimes people have the wrong idea sometimes and it leads them to the wrong conclusion, happens to me all the time anyway. So please expand on "why". - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiS8mYACgkQOjLpvpq7dMp6KACfXUTRAZWcvdXwfl4wbfa+1t38 OHsAnjtCC8yCVANwv2SnVSsSQxXT8zX9 =IZ4l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
