I cannot reproduce this problem. Can anyone else test? Alan? Scott
On 8/23/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/23/05, Tobias Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > when trying to use the captive portal on 0.79 there is a strange thing. > > Following ports work without authentication: > > MySQL, smtp, ping, ssh, name. Others I didn´t check. > > m0n0wall (1.2b9) doesn´t show this behaviour. > > Is this a bug or a feature? > > That's rather strange. It's not doing that here. Can you send me > your config.xml to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the passwrods). > > > > > heres my configuration > > > > 212.x.x.x 192.168.0.x / 24 192.168.1.x / 24 > > ---------- ------ ----------- > > -----| Router |--| FW |----------| pfsense |------------- > > ---------- ------ ----------- > > (WAN - 192.168.0.129) (LAN - 192.168.1.1) > > > > I didn´t check the checkbox "block private networks" because one of the > > Mail-Servers has a private ip-address (192.168.99.x) > > > > Another feature of m0n0wall which i think its very useful is the > > Reauthentication in current beta version. > > So accounting works good for our use. Is it planned to integrate this > > feature in a future pfsense version? > > I thought we where pretty much in sync. I'll take a look at it. > > Scott > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
