Put it this way: A $60 linksys router can do this (WRT54G with stock firmware, for example)... Why can't these expensive ones do it? Or even better, pfSense? :) The reason why it's so crazy for us is that we have several hosting customers, and having to do split horizon DNS for upwords of 15-20 customers is bad enough-- I can't imagine when we add more!
Dimitri Rodis Integrita Systems LLC -----Original Message----- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:57 PM Cc: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT On 8/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please show an example if this is possible... > > From what I understand the problem still exists. > sounds like it works on 1:1, but I do believe it's still an issue for inbound and server NAT, or whatever we call it now. People throw such a fit about it, but this is very common in commercial firewalls. If it's not too big of a mess, we should certainly fix it, but if it's pretty involved let's let it slide until post-1.0. -cmb --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
