On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:05 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > > I think it will work better with a "dummy" ip. But it will work > > without a ip as well now. > > Hm. Dummy IP looks like ugliest and the most unintuitive solution. > > Also as I noted it results in few options breaking - anti lockout and > stuff.
Which I noted that I fixed. > If you'we fixed these to use WAN IP address in this case instead, I do > not understand why do you need fake address at all. Because you cannot add rules to the LAN interface without it? > Practically speaking all rules with fake IP are broken and functionality > which they expect to provide to provide does not work. If you do not enter an IP on the interface, that is correct. > Well. Anyway I'll just wait for new version and check how it works in > all 3 cases. Yes, please do. Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
