Personally I have number 4 setup... It took several days of playing, and to be honest I'm not sure what all was the reason it finally worked.
But I have this setup: WAN: "Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application" CHECKED WAN2: "Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application" CHECKED WAN3: "Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application" CHECKED LAN: "Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application" UNCHECKED LAN2: "Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application" UNCHECKED I also have a loopback rule set on the LAN and LAN2 (read it somewhere on the forum... and it actually worked) LAN(s) RULE - PROTO:TCP SOURCE:ANY PORT:ANY DESTINATION:127.0.0.1/31 PORT: 8000-8030 GATEWAY:DEFAULT Good luck! And hopefully it works for you! -----Original Message----- From: David Cavanaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:06 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multimple WAN ftp server thing. O I C. So, I read what I could find, and I could use some clearing up: Choose one of the following: 1) FTP incoming or outgoing is impossible with Multi-WAN on either WAN interface 2) FTP is impossible on Multi-WAN incoming, but possible outgoing only through WAN1 3) FTP is impossible on Multi-WAN incoming, but possible outgoing through either WAN (the lb gateway) 4) FTP is possible on Multi-WAN incoming and outgoing only through WAN1 5) FTP is possible on Multi-WAN incoming only through WAN1 and outgoing through either WAN (the lb gateway) Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:09 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multimple WAN ftp server thing. On 4/10/08, David Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all and greetings: > > We've recently switched to pfsense to, among other things, take advantage of > the multiple WAN feature. > > So, we have two interfaces defined thusly: > > <wan> > <if>em0</if> > <mtu/> > <blockpriv/> > <media/> > <mediaopt/> > <bandwidth>100</bandwidth> > <bandwidthtype>Mb</bandwidthtype> > <spoofmac/> > <disableftpproxy/> > <ipaddr>74.x.x.4</ipaddr> > <subnet>29</subnet> > <gateway>74.x.x.3</gateway> > </wan> > <opt1> > <if>sis0</if> > <descr>WAN2</descr> > <bridge/> > <enable/> > <ipaddr>170.x.x.2</ipaddr> > <subnet>30</subnet> > <gateway>170.x.x.1</gateway> > <spoofmac/> > <mtu/> > </opt1> > > WAN(WAN) is a T1. OPT1(WAN2) is a DSL. > > We created a LoadBalance Gateway with WAN and WAN2, as follows: > <lbpool> > <type>gateway</type> > <behaviour>failover</behaviour> > <monitorip/> > <name>LANLoadBalance</name> > <desc>Load Balance LAN</desc> > <port/> > <servers>wan|208.67.217.132</servers> > <servers>opt1|208.67.217.132</servers> > <monitor/> > </lbpool> > > We have users in the field trying to access an FTP server on the LAN via the > OPT1(WAN2) IP address. Without me going any further, is such a thing > feasible? > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FTP is not supported on multi-wan. This question comes up every couple months. Search the archives / forum for more information. Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
