On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Chris Flugstad <ch...@cascadelink.com> wrote: > So i have 2 WANS > 100.100.100.4 DSL > 216.127.123.4 Wireless back to Colo > > When the Wireless backhaul is disconnected or "down", anything else on its > subnet is not accessible over the other WAN. It's as if it only things it > can access it through that wan and not through the other. Maybe this isnt > the case. I noticed this when I was using the wireless for something else > and our phones went down. Service is provider to them on the same subnet as > the backhaul, and although they CAN get to there server via the dsl, they > werent for some reason. Even after adding a firewall rule to send ANY > packet on IP of phone to GW dsl line, it still wouldnt. Creepy? I'll play > more with it tomorrow. Not a problem,, as I can just plug back in the > wireless, but just a thought as to why this was happening, and to avoid it > in the situation the wireless goes down, God forbid. >
Probably one of two things: 1) Existing state out the wireless that doesn't get closed when it fails and no new connection is attempted. 2) Traffic proxied through something on the firewall (ex: siproxd), which will always obey the system routing table. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
