I'd really like to see source NAT added. I've been used to pf on openbsd for a while... it'll let you abuse nat any way you like it, and will still call you the next day. I tried pfsense and actually really liked it a lot. it was eventually the lack of options for NAT that made me switch back... no source distinction and strange collisions complaints when allocating ports (overlaps which wouldnt actually have hindered traffic).
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Paul Mansfield <it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com>wrote: > On 18/12/09 10:58, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:13:45AM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen > (pfse...@tapanitarvai > > > >> I took a stab at hacking filter.inc and modified it so that if > >> there's <source-address> modifier in the nat rule, it uses it > >> as source in the rdr entry. > > > > Does anybody think it'd be worthwhile to submit that as a patch? > > Or would someone like to see it otherwise (small enough even > > for posting on the list, perhaps - 105 line context diff)? > > it does sound useful, even for those who just want to tinker! > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com > For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > >
