On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Chris Buechler <cbuech...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Gino O'Donnell <gino....@gmail.com> wrote: >> (Bought the pfsense book and it doesn't cover this subject very well) >> >> I'm trying to figure out if this is actually doable on pfSense 1.2.3 or 2.0. >> >> I have a main /30 that 3 other networks are routed to on a single >> ethernet. I'm currently using a Cisco ASA that has the 3 other >> networks assigned to individual interfaces, all routed to the main >> interface which is routed to the /30. >> >> All hosts behind the firewall have and need public IP addresses (NAT >> is out of the question and beyond the scope of this post). >> >> The thing that I'm trying to figure out is can pfSense work in a mode >> (like bridged) to replace this ASA, allowing for the hosts behind the >> firewall to retain their public IP addresses AND have the ability to >> communicate with each other? >> > > Yes but bridged is not what you want, you just want to route the > public IPs no differently than you're doing on the ASA. >
Note that is in the book, in the Routing chapter, under Routing Public IPs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
