On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Chris Buechler <cbuech...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes ... it's a problem that the developers don't seem to care too much about >> :( >> http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/495 > > There's a big difference between not caring and not being able to fix > something - that was the latter, not the former. Though I didn't see > the patch linked there, will see if that's reasonable to apply.
Generally I am extremely impressed with everything pfSense, but it seemed like the problem was being ignored. Sorry if I was being unfairly harsh. On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Tim Nelson <tnel...@rockbochs.com> wrote: >> > without patching kernel, just by adding to /boot/loader.conf line: >> > kern.cam.boot_delay=10000 >> > It makes CAM subsystem to wait at least specified time (in ms) for >> > delayed bus registration. > > This works!!! I set the value to 5000 and booting proceeds exactly as > expected. > > I don't see how this could/would have an undesired effects on other > hardware... > is it possible to have this added to the default pfSense loader.conf in time > for > the next beta or for sure the 2.0 release? Other than slowing boot down by 5 seconds :-) Regards, -Jeppe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
