Obviously, those things, which are unthinkable on the turf of the "free world", appeared to be quite suitable for the territories of the former Yugoslavia. We are not going to quote chronologically all events that paved the way out to the mutual interethnic killings (an overt Slovenian and Croatians preparation for the armed rebellion-secession from Yugoslavia, their clandestine armament etc.). For the reason, this theme were well documented and everyone interested to know the truth about the "Third Balkan War" could easily have it found in many articles and documentaries, especially in those made for the purpose of Serbian condemnation. Certainly, all he needs (apart the good will to read a huge amount of information) is a big inquisitiveness and a regularly developed level of critical thought.

Based on the above thinking, it seems, the most important thing in matters like this is the ability to make a clear distinction between causes and consequences. The leading world media, politicians and social scientists hardly even tried to scratch the surface of the bloody Balkan reality and take a profound research down to the deepest social-historical layers hidden behind the great burden of an unbroken ancestral "wire". Should we at all mention that the main differences among people on this planet are not the way they look, walk, eat and work but in those activities inevitable connected with the outstanding characteristic of the living creature ? human speech. For man, language is everything: education, tradition, religion, entertainment, interpersonal relations based on the mental processes and not on the sheer impulsion coming of the empty stomach or similar physiologically determined needs. Furthermore, thanks to speech, man got an extraordinary capacity to accumulate the knowledge through the long millenniums of his existence and simultaneously he acquired a new psychological profile in which responsibility and conscience (repentance, remorse) played the main role.

Despite the fact, that the great European scholars had established the main philosophical principles in ancient and medieval times and, contrary to the logical expectations, that those wisdom-foundations will advance rapidly in modern times, we are the witnesses of an enormous (might be irreversible) decay of human thought. Is it possible that technical (practical, pragmatic) mind is going to destroy the subtlety and nicety of deep and introspective reflections? Instead of being better, man became more and more inclined to evil deeds, which could be remotely used and concealed with the help of highly sophisticated and "virtual reality" creating equipment. For instance, when a normal man is seeing with his own eyes an act of brutality or cruelty like cold-blood killing either some other kind of torture and menace towards a single individual, he react quite different then in cases of an indiscriminate massacre committed via bombs and rockets. Let us give an example: imagine a soldier, artilleryman or fighter plane pilot, who is feeding the mouth of the monster and firing grenades (bombs) at the besieged urban area.

What is he thinking about in that moment? Maybe he thinks about his wife (girl friend) or about the future of his children. As we see, the soldier on the battleground does not consider the most important item: what harm his weapon could have done to the innocent people, especially children. Some kind of ill-structured and "chain-dogged" tasks, prearranged by commanding hierarchy, had completely shackled the major streaks in human character we mentioned above, primarily a man's aptitude to feel compassion for the someone else's suffering and tragedy. The effect of such "brain control" is a total nonexistence of individual neither collective responsibility, no matter what harms nor what crimes had been committed in the name of "humanism" or "general prosperity".

Naturally, the previous "philosophy" matters for those nations and social circles that have enough power and those that could not be subjected to the "humanitarian" surveillance nor scrutinized by the NWO/NGO ("all seeing and divine") eyes. There is no more efficient way to camouflage someone else's felony but to distract attention of the public to a similar misdeed, even the one hoaxed just for a temporary use. Although the story of Srebrenica was the "product" to be used for a similar purpose (to cover up the open secessionism of Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnian Moslem population), it is far a way of those fraudulent activities whose consequences and wounds will mitigate or easily heal in the near future. The USA administration had carefully planned for years the "legend" of Srebrenica Moslem martyring. On 6 August 1992, just 20 minutes after the phony pictures of Serb held "concentration camp" were released; George Bush, Sr. held a press conference at a Colorado Air Base. He concluded: "The Serbs would be harshly punished for their crimes". As a first step towards breaking up of Yugoslavia, USA then recognized secessionist Republics (Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia) and introduced tighten economic sanction on Serbia. In 1992 USA also demanded from the UN Security Council to authorize the use of force in the Balkans. Bush's successor, president Clinton, continued the path that Bush had shoveled and American hostile policy against the Serbs became more then obvious.

Let us at this point go back to Europe. It seems, there is no rational way, which could be able to explain the blindness of the European politicians. Why they supported those movements in former Yugoslavia, which apparently were against the general interest of all European countries? Is it possible they did not know that mutiny, secession and foundation of a new banana states on the European soil could jeopardize the social order, interethnic relations and coexistence the Europe have achieved with the help of their humanistic thought. Had it ever slipped their mind that the Balkan is a part of Europe? Finally, why the Europe had so eagerly scurried to protect Bosnian Moslems and zealously sustained the manufacture of the false image of Allah's martyrs? It is a well known fact that a few of the European countries have a significant number of their citizens who originally belong to the Odd Galaxy of Islam. Are they afraid of the domestic Mohammedan fanatics and not able to find any other solution to neutralize them but (as a suicidal alternative), trying to please them with the part of the Balkan's (mostly Serbian) flesh? Are the Europeans aware they are fostering the Islamic fundamentalism (a potential Europe's executioner) inside their own bosom? Has, the once extraordinary sharp brainpower of the founders of the modern European principles of mutual understanding, unexpectedly lost its intellectual strength?

European politicians and social scientist advocate passionately in favor of some kind of "moderate" Islam, with the naivety of an excited preschooler! Whoever had carefully read "The Holy Book of Islam" (Koran) must have realized that there is no hope for the backwardness of the followers of Mohammad. Kalima¹ (the non-created word of God Allah) does not allow any Moslem believer to express his thoughts freely and openly. According to Koran, everyone, who is not a member of the Islamic religion, is an infidel (Kafir), liar and hypocrite (Munafik). Koran says: wallahu ma?a al-sabirin: God is with those who persevere. In fact, God is with those who refuse to stop of converting the whole world to Allah's "sanctuary". Another quote from Koran: Verily the sabirun will receive a reward without hisab /measure/ (39:10). What is the real meaning of the word sabirun², often translated as "patient"? In the next sentence, we shall clearly see that sabirun means "conqueror", "warrior", or, simply ? killer of infidels: How many a little company hath overcome a mighty host (army) by Allah's leave! Allah is with the as-sabirun."(Koran.2:249). So, the Moslem who kills a person who does not acknowledge Allah, deserves an immeasurable award in heaven.

¹⁾ It is interesting, in Koran, one of the names of Isa (JesusChrist) was Kalima (Word). Let us compare it with Latin "clamo", "clamare" (pro/claim, declare), and Serbian word "galama" (noise, fuss, clamor, fracas, cry). When we say in Serbian "on je galamio" (he cried), it means that someone spoke loudly. Of course, the root of these words is an agglutinated form of the ancient language, which we shall conditionally name Surbelanian, is ko/li/um, firmly connected with the Serbian noun "oko" (lat. oculus, eye) and the verb (Serbian vrba, vrbovati, borba, tvorba; German werben /tout, advertise) "okoliti" (surround, enclose, encircle).

²⁾The other Arab word, "sabirun" could be explained with the Serbian verb "sabirati" "sabrati" (collect, compile). In Surbelanian it sounded approximately like "sur/be/ri/ti". Later on, we are going to explain more precisely the genesis of the human speech and the crucial role the Surbelanian (agglutinated form of Slavic) language played in it.

(To be continued)

The Truth of the Mendacity

Fw: The Truth of the Mendacity (2)

Одговори путем е-поште