> The modification I was thinking of would be to bring the 6 speakers on stands 
> into a hexagon on a plane. 
> Why? It makes it easy > to set up--but more importantly, I'd now have two 
> speakers set up at +/-60deg 
> for stereo compatible playback. OR, 
> it is also possible to do a bit more rearranging (rotating and adding 2 more 
> speakers) to include a 5.0 array in the set-up.

I have the setup that you might be thinking of, that is a hexagon with one 
speaker at front center,
The +- 60 degrees speakers works fine for stereo if one moves the listening 
position back from the "ambisonic hotspot"
For stereo and surround listening.
The +- 120 degree speakers maps fine into 5.1 back channels as 5.1 back 
speakers really are back/side speakers.
The radius of the setup is probably limited by the flore to roof distance.

If you place 4 speakers at +- 60 and +- 120 degrees vertically referenced to 
the center front speaker you will get a
10 channel ambisonic system with height, 
Fons has already created a decoder setup for ambdec of this layout for me.

According to Fons it is not a bad setup refering to the symmetry, and for the 
power amp you can use 2 home teater amplifiers with external decoder inputs.
You have to get the volume control/gain setting identical for this to work well.

I speculate more symmetric solution would be to use 4 speakers on the floor and 
4 in the roof, 
Placement defined by "rotating" the side speakers in the hexagon +-60 degrees 
with the front and back speakers as rotational axis.

This will also enable construction of a symetric layout with a slighty wider 
radius if the radius is limited by room height.
But this will require 14 channels.

- Bosse

 



-----Original Message-----
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On 
Behalf Of Joseph Anderson
Sent: den 25 mars 2011 12:10
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Reflections from the wodden floor on an ambisonic room..

Hello David,

This sounds great! Congrats in getting the resources together to make this 
happen.


I see there have been a number of comments regarding possible set ups--I'll add 
a few thoughts here as I've been thinking about putting together a 2nd order 
system. I was thinking of something along the lines of either an icosahedron, 
or a modified icosahedron.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icosahedron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Icosahedron_model.JPG

Placing speakers at the vertices means you'd need 12. The 2nd link above 
illustrates an arrangement for a true icosahedron. You'd have 3 speakers on the 
floor, 3 on the ceiling, and the remaining 6 on stands. (These 6 would be by 
the yellow struts in the photo link above.)

The modification I was thinking of would be to bring the 6 speakers on stands 
into a hexagon on a plane. Why? It makes it easy to set up--but more 
importantly, I'd now have two speakers set up at +/-60deg for stereo compatible 
playback. OR, it is also possible to do a bit more rearranging (rotating and 
adding 2 more speakers) to include a 5.0 array in the set-up.

------
Re the floor....

I'd think about throwing some carpets or rugs down. Reducing reflections can 
make a big difference.



My best,
Jo

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joseph Anderson

27 Hungate, Pickering, North Yorkshire, YO18 7DL, UK 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



On 24 Mar 2011, at 3:15 pm, david monacchi wrote:

> we're planning to build in Pesaro-Italy a small ambisonic studio with 13 
> loudspeakers (full 3D - 4@-45°, 4@0°, 4@+45°, 1@90°).. We're now in the 
> process of moving walls, treating acoustically the room, etc.. The room will 
> be 5.00 x 4.60 x 3.20h and we are planning to treat it to be as more 'dead' 
> as possible..
> 
> In order to have a 'pleasant' space, we're thinking to put a wodden floor 
> which, to a certain degree, will also help absorbing some low frequencies..
> 
> My question is: 
> considering that the room will be semi-anechoic, is the reflection from the 
> wodden floor really compromizing for the correct soundfied reconstruction? 
> Are there studies that you know with experimental data, or simply your direct 
> experience on this?



_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to