Stefan Schreiber wrote:
... I also wanted to provide some < reasons > why I propose certain
features/elements, and some real discussion base. 5.1 won't go away,
but the proposal (sound field format/SFF) is clearly both more
powerful and flexible. It is also more complicated, we have to admit.
(It is an open standard, in this sense different than Mpeg-H 3DA.
Without being able to give any proof because you can't prepare
unfinished states, I believe that SFF could/will be a lot simpler than
Mpeg-H 3DA.)
"Prepare" has to be replaced with "compare", of course.
Best,
Stefan
P.S.: But I will prepare the "unfinished state theory" of audio surround
signals and standard proposals for a later article, or maybe a book...
O:-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140108/25d5516a/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
