On 22 Feb 99 at 1:51, Travis Siegel wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Or Botton wrote:
>
> > This reminds me: Windows 95 seems to have a limit which do not let
> > it exploit more then 32MB of actuall RAM. Once this limit is reached,
> > off we go to Virtual memory. So what if you got 64MB RAM?
> >
>
> Actually, win95 can access up to 64MB of ram, but nothing above that.
Can you proove that Windows 95 can access up to 64MB of RAM and not
32? I would like to try it for myself.
Or Botton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense."
-----------------------------
http://members.xoom.com/dsdp/
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
