"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> Well, given that it's NOT as fast and stable as the original progman.ini,
> there IS no appeal.
I haven't had too much trouble with Calmira. It seems stable enough.
Conceptually, it offered easier file handling, easier
> desktop management, and more user configurable appearance. Personally
> I've never liked the stuff cluttering my desktop, but the w9x style
> interface is less cluttered than the w3x interface just the same. I like
> to have NO icons, just a couple popup menus to access all, and some nice
> art to look at when I'm between programs.
That is the main reason I use Calmira....an uncluttered screen! So many
windows have to be inside Progman.exe which meams that it has to be
screen size unless you have a huge monitor.
> Still, from my brief excursion with Calmira, I'd say that if you have the
> resources to run it, you don't need to because you can run the 32 bit w9x
> instead. It's tough to find w3x software. If yer gonna run windows, you
> might as well run the newest your hardware can, and be free to access all
> the neato stuff that is available out there.
> Pippi sez "two braids down for calmira".
I don't like Win95, However. I like my PCDOS 7 Rev. 1, with WFWG
3.11....it's much faster and lets me have more control. Win9x doesn't
let you change anything, remove anything or whatever else I want to do.
Chad A. Fernandez
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
