hammer wrote:
> I dreamed of (and played with) an idea of that sort for quite a while:
> the "formatting/coding" would be that dead trivial that any kid, a
> BASIC oneliner, or even the right combination of settings and
> arguments for LIST would "decode" it, but m$.doc expecting attachment
> decoders would choke into a deep blue death.
EBCDIC it's a standard (although a bit bizar) and it should be fairly
easy to convert, tools are readily available. I'll bet you a virtual
beer Word chokes on it.
>
> ".YUK" though seems a tiny bit too obviously suspicion raising. Some
> rather innocent looking, "probable" sounding extension would be needed
> too. Three-letter phantasies invited here.
.dcm , looks like document.
--
Casper Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I'm a guy too. Jerry Springer
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
