At 11:12 AM 4/9/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Pippi wrote:
> >you know, I REALLY love those windows keys.
>(snip)
>
>Ok, I must say that I don't like using the second mouse button (or the
>single extra key for it on "win95 keyboards"). The reason is quite simple -
>in almost every windows 9x/NT version I've used I have been able to crash
>the system after not loading many (if any) programs at all.
>snip
>BTW: Yesterday my system assumed (in Explorer) that both mouse buttons
>where the right one :( (And the mouse "works" (see my earlier posts about
>mice) everywhere except there).
>//Bernie
It's weird how often I hear of this, yet how seldom I experience
it. Neither on this my win98 machine, nor my fiancee's machine, nor his
roommate's machine (also win98) all of which run on 32MB ram, nor indeed on
my old 486sl25 laptop with 20MB RAM running win95. When I was running
win98 on a 586/133mhz w/32MB ram I also did not find it crashy. Only if I
overloaded the system and I knew it's limits from testing them. Or if I
was running questionable apps from questionable sources (independant
shareware and the like.) Only real trouble I"ve had is running Outlook
express and then when I issue confusing commands (like sending mail for
which I"ve not configured it) I use OE for news only. Perhaps it's that
bit of pyrite I've glued into the case for magic?
bye,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(\
Yolanda ,,,,,,,,,,\\_/(\
UIN 4898262,,,..,,,Q Q \)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=(_T_)=
http://members.home.net/pippi5
{.. / .-.. --- ...- . / -... ..- -. -. .. . ... .-.-.- } A+
Inertia. It's not just an object at rest tends to stay at rest; it's
also an object in motion tends to stay in motion.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
