"Vicente A.S. Werner" wrote:
>
> >I would stick with SuSe for many reasons despite RedHat been the standard.
> >Standard doesn't mean better, if you are not convinced have a look at
> >Windoze.
> >
>
> I really agree with you , maybe redhat it's the standard but from my
> experience isn't the best. The truth is that RH 5.2 has lost appeal to me
> and I rather use RH 5.1 or some derivation of it than the last 5.2.
> And as you say Standard doesn't mean better, I think it does mean,
> old, less able, minimun and this is to my taste incompatable with best
> or high performance.
>
When did RH become the standard? From what I've seen they deviated
from the file structure standards (am I wrong here?) I think the reason
they are being thought of as the standard is only because they seem to
be more in the lime-light than the other distro's here in America
because of the various companies putting money into RH and the various
press stories about them always popping up.
--
Ec|ipse on EFnet - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.primenet.com/~tomas
Ec|ipse@|Watcher| - botnet webpage down until further notice
Slackware Linux v3.6 - Kernels 2.0.35/2.1.131
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
