you can save a lot of time by creating the config you like with 'make
menuconfig' then 'make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install' it runs
the whole lot instead of issueing the 6 separate commands listed below!
Lenz: Is there any disadvantage to using my suggested method?
-----Original Message-----
From: Lenz Grimmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 1999 9:30 AM
To: SuSE Linux Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] Kernel 2.2.0
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Nelson Marques wrote:
> I have this little problem:
> I installed the 2.2.0 kernel in a Suse6 installation, but it runs
> kernel 2.0.36 instead, WHY??????
Make sure, that you use the correct install path for lilo and the
Makefile. By default, the kernel will be installed as /vmlinuz, while LILO
is looking for /boot/vmlinuz. Either correct /etc/lilo.conf or the
variable INSTALL_PATH in /usr/src/linux/Makefile
> And why doesn't the gcc compiler compile 2.2.2 kernel sources??
> Procedure:
> make menuconfig
> make dep
> make clean
> make bzImage
> make modules
> make modules_install
This seems to be a common problem with 2.2.2. I still run 2.2.1, though...
Bye,
LenZ
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Lenz Grimmer SuSE GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Schanzaeckerstr. 10
http://www.suse.de/~grimmer 90443 Nuernberg, Germany
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
